California has a goal of reducing emissions 80-percent from 1990 levels by 2050.
The study by the non-partisan group says a number of changes will be needed if the goal is to be met.
It says the current electricity pricing system doesn’t reflect true cost differences between using electricity during peak and off-peak hours. For example, current rates make charging an electric car at night six to eight times more expensive than during the day.
If you want to reduce oil dependency, go after the big dark green area first.
The government is encouraging you to drive a car, and if California is truly serious about reducing its oil dependency that needs to change. This is the unequivocal conclusion of Unraveling Ties to Petroleum a new report commissioned by Next 10 California and written by UCLA researchers Juan Matute, Director of the UCLA Local Climate Initiative, and Stephanie Pincetl, Adjunct Professor and Director of the California Center for Sustainable Communities at UCLA.
California is a leader on the renewable energy front: utilities are well on their way to meeting the 33 percent RPS mandate, rooftop solar power is growing like crazy, and there are big desires to electrify transportation via High Speed Rail.
But a new report, released by the nonprofit, nonpartisan group Next 10, notes that a variety of policies keep California locked into a transportation system that is largely dependent on oil. Part of it is sheer size: there are 35,209,430 registered motor vehicles in the state.
• New study highlights connections between seemingly unconnected policies
• “There are many options for reducing emissions in the state”
California policies that have that at first glance seem to have little to no connection to petroleum use actually provide incentives that drive demand for oil use artificially high in the state, according to a new report from the nonprofit, nonpartisan group Next 10.
California's budget conference committee is now working to reconcile the House and Senate approved versions of the California budget. The state's shift this year from indebted to balanced has put Governor Brown's budget, which supports a baseline level of spending for some social service programs, at odds with Democratic lawmakers, who would like to restore some funding to programs hit hard by recession-era cuts.